Neo4j

Neo4j is the graph database and analytics leader, uniquely optimized to handle complex data relationships by representing data as nodes, relationships, and properties.

Registered address
9 Raffles Place, Republic Plaza #26-01, Singapore 048619
Request a quoteContactVisit website

Overview of Neo4j

Specialization
Graph Database

Neo4j is the graph database and analytics leader, uniquely optimized to handle complex data relationships by representing data as nodes, relationships, and properties. Trusted by 58% of the Fortune 500 and thousands of government agencies, Neo4j enables organizations to uncover insights across fraud detection, supply chain optimization, personalized recommendations, and knowledge graphs. As the preferred graph partner across all major cloud providers, Neo4j leads in GraphRAG technology, enabling developers to build accurate, transparent, explainable generative AI applications. Supporting a global community of 250,000+ developers, Neo4j is an IMDA Accredited company.

  • Recorded Singapore presence: Singapore-registered entity (UEN), Physical Singapore office
  • Address: 9 Raffles Place, Republic Plaza #26-01, Singapore 048619
  • Email: evian.chua@neo4j.com
  • Website: https://neo4j.com/
  • Capabilities: AWS
  • Tech ecosystem: AWS (Advanced)

Data checked 25 May 2026 Report incorrect data

Buyer Decision Checklist

Singapore analytics spend splits across BI platforms, data-engineering consultancies, and managed analytics services — and the costliest mistakes happen on data quality, governance, and lock-in long before a dashboard ships. Use this checklist to separate decision-grade vendors from those selling pretty visuals.

How to evaluate a data & analytics provider in Singapore

  • Confirm where data engineering ends and dashboards begin: a serious partner spends most of the project on ingestion, cleaning, modelling, and governance, so be wary of anyone leading with visual mockups in week one.
  • Pin down PDPA obligations before any data moves — agree who is data intermediary vs controller, where personal data is stored and processed, and how the PDPC breach-notification and retention duties are met across the pipeline.
  • Demand a governed semantic layer (Power BI semantic models, LookML, ThoughtSpot Worksheets, or dbt) so 'revenue' and 'customer' mean one thing across every dashboard — not raw tables each team redefines.
  • Model a 3-year TCO across the relevant cost shape (per-user, per-capacity, or per-query) and check PSG / EDG eligibility on the IMDA Tech Depot list, since the same tool through the wrong reseller may not be grant-eligible.
  • Write data export and lock-in terms into the contract up front: full export of raw data, models, and metric definitions in open formats on exit, with no proprietary holdback.
  • Require a written skills-transfer plan — documentation, paired delivery, and a handover phase — so your own team can sustain and extend the analytics rather than depend on the vendor forever.

Verify for Neo4j

  • Confirm key details directly with the vendor — this listing isn't vendor-managed yet.
  • Ask for two recent Singapore client references you can speak with.
  • Ask for a written scope of services before comparing quotes.
  • Request evidence of relevant certifications and their current validity.

Questions to ask

  • What share of this project is data engineering versus visualisation, and what is your plan for data quality and the governed semantic layer?
  • Under PDPA, are you acting as our data intermediary, and where exactly will our personal and business data be stored and processed?
  • On exit, what can we export — raw data, models, and metric definitions — and in what formats, with no proprietary lock-in?
  • Can you share two Singapore clients of similar size and data maturity that I can speak to about decision-grade outcomes, not just dashboards delivered?

Prepared under the TechDirectory editorial byline with review credit June C; this label is not proof of identity, credentials, or a completed human review. This directory-authored checklist is not attributed to Neo4j; editorial independence has not been independently audited. Editorial standards

27/100

Profile signal score

Based on recorded profile signals. It is not a certification or independent verification of every claim, and it does not measure vendor quality or endorsement; paid plans do not affect it. How it works.

  • UEN recorded on profile UEN recorded 20/20
  • Owner-claimed profile No owner claim recorded 0/10
  • Recorded grant eligibility None recorded 0/15
  • Recorded CSA trustmark None / expired 0/15
  • Listed certifications None listed 0/10
  • Approved reviews No approved reviews yet 0/20
  • Profile completeness 7/10 completeness 7/10