IoT projects in Singapore live or die on connectivity choice, device security, and whether the data ever reaches an enterprise system that triggers action. Evaluate the vendor on the integration and lifecycle layers, not the sensor datasheet.
How to evaluate an IoT solutions provider in Singapore
- Lock down connectivity first — make the vendor justify NB-IoT, LoRaWAN, cellular, or Wi-Fi against your coverage, payload, and battery needs, and confirm any RF equipment carries the required IMDA registration.
- Get the integration scope in writing: ask how the vendor wires sensor data into your BMS, CMMS, or ERP (BACnet, Modbus, REST) and budget for it as the largest line item, not an afterthought.
- Treat device security as a procurement gate — require certificate-based device identity, signed firmware with over-the-air updates, and a published vulnerability-disclosure and patching SLA aligned to CSA's IoT guidance and the Cybersecurity Labelling Scheme.
- Settle data ownership and platform lock-in before signing: confirm you own the raw telemetry, can export it, and can move off the platform without losing history or re-buying hardware.
- Demand real field-deployment battery and failure data for Singapore's heat and humidity, then model replacement labour at scale into a multi-year TCO rather than trusting datasheet lifespans.
- Check PSG / IMDA and BCA grant eligibility before procurement — the same product may be co-funded if bought through the right channel, so confirm the route before you commit.
Verify for Cerekon
- Confirm key details directly with the vendor — this listing isn't vendor-managed yet.
- Ask for two recent Singapore client references you can speak with.
- Ask for a written scope of services before comparing quotes.
- Request evidence of relevant certifications and their current validity.
Questions to ask
- What is your proven battery life from actual Singapore field deployments, and who pays for sensor replacement once they fail?
- Do we own and can we freely export the raw telemetry, and what does an exit off your platform look like?
- What is your firmware update mechanism and your committed SLA for patching a disclosed vulnerability?
- Can you walk through one Singapore deployment of similar scale where you integrated with an existing enterprise system?